CO129-052 - Sir Bowring - 1855 [9-12] — Page 218

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

has

the result, which I lory before you,

Mlory & your Completely satisfied me that Excellency how been misinformed to the facts of the case, and that the Colonial Mutterritics have excreived noe but legitimate jurisdiction in the particular instance under diveusom. I trust that your seelleney with the from Mr.May's statement, written in reply to questione put to brim by the Colonial Secretary, that no samant

L wow demanded by the officer in charge of the "Reindeer", that no warrant was

warrant

recevesary, either by Low-or Luston,

being criminal was not

that the cave

it was necessary

which it was necessary or usual

to take through the Conwill, and that

the course adopted in that invariably followed on all dimilar recasting:

You will ales perecive Hust & very

2152

great misrepresentation has been made to you, masmuch as the affair of Madion

was not one in which the police head the least interest, still less "did they entrive his release from the "Reindeer", or lend themselves to it, ow Your Excellency, upon what grands I know not, states that you hove

reason to believe.

Equally graudlew in the evorge

trast Madison how been taken into the

Service of this Government.

I'am at a love to reconcile for

Excelleney's statement that this is "not the only cave" of this nature","though "the most flagrant", with your sube- -quent

_quent overment that the case is made

exception to the hitherto miversal practice in the Colony ; but, from the "dronments before you, you with fee that

Edit History

2026-05-17 21:56:56 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

has to the result, which I lory before you, Mlory & your Completely satisfied me that Excellency how been misinformed to the facts of the case, and that the Colonial Mutterritics have excreived noe but legitimate jurisdiction in the particular instance under diveusom. I trust that your seelleney with the from Mr.May's statement, written in reply to questione put to brim by the Colonial Secretary, that no samant L wow demanded by the officer in charge of the "Reindeer", that no warrant was warrant recevesary, either by Low-or Luston, being criminal was not that the cave Me it was necessary which it was necessary or usual to take through the Conwill, and that the course adopted in that invariably followed on all dimilar recasting: You will ales perecive Hust & very ** 1 2152 great misrepresentation has been made to you, masmuch as the affair of Madion was not one in which the police head the least interest, still less "did they entrive his release from the "Reindeer", or lend themselves to it, ow Your Excellency, upon what grands I know not, states that you hove reason to believe. Equally graudlew in the evorge trast Madison how been taken into the Service of this Government. I'am at a love to reconcile for " Excelleney's statement that this is "not the only cave" of this nature","though "the most flagrant", with your sube- -quent _quent overment that the case is made exception to the hitherto miversal practice in the Colony ; but, from the "dronments before you, you with fee that

Baseline (Original)

has to the result, which I lory before you, Mlory & your Completely satisfied me that Excellency how been misinformed to the facts of the case, and that the Colonial Mutterritics have excreived noe but legitimate jurisdiction in the particular instance under diveusom. I trust that your seelleney with the from Mr.May's statement, written in reply to questione put to brim by the Colonial Secretary, that no samant L wow demanded by the officer in charge of the "Reindeer", _ that no warrant was warrant recevesary, either by Low-or Luston, being criminal was not that the cave Me it was necessary which it was necessary or usual to take through the Conwill, _ and that ་ ༡* the course adopted in that invariably followed on all dimilar recasting: You will ales perecive Hust & very ** 1 2152 great misrepresentation has been made to you, masmuch as the affair of Madion was not one in which the police head the least interest, still less "did they entrive his release from the "Reindeer", or lend themselves to it, ow Your Excellency, upon what grands I know not, states that you hove reason to believe. Equally graudlew in the evorge П trast Madison how been taken into the Service of this Government. I'am at a love to reconcile for " Excelleney's statement that this is "not the only cave" of this nature","though "the most flagrant", with your sube- -quent _quent overment that the case is made exception to the hitherto miversal practice in the Colony ; but, from the "dronments before you, you with fee that

2026-05-17 21:56:56 · Baseline

View content

has